<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Building Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure</link>
	<description>Notes on building a solid IT Infrastructure with a focus on Microsoft technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Just Another &quot;I&#8217;m at Tech-Ed 2007&quot; Post (Not!)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=16</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are an IT professional working with Microsoft technologies then Tech-Ed is the conference to attend (although&#160;some organizations have issues with sending employees to &#8220;conferences&#8221; so you might need to sell it as a &#8220;technical training event&#8221; to&#160;be able&#160;to attend.) Even if you are unable to attend Tech-Ed, there&#8217;s no reason to miss out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are an IT professional working with Microsoft technologies then Tech-Ed is <strong><u>the</u></strong> conference to attend (although&nbsp;some organizations have issues with sending employees to &#8220;conferences&#8221; so you might need to sell it as a &#8220;technical training event&#8221; to&nbsp;be able&nbsp;to attend.)</p>
<p>Even if you are unable to attend Tech-Ed, there&#8217;s no reason to miss out on all the great sessions that take place at it.&nbsp; During the conference, some sessions are simulcast via the Virtual Tech-Ed <a href="http://www.virtualteched.com/" target="_blank">website</a> (so you can listen to and see the presentation live) and all the sessions are available as part of a DVD set a month or&nbsp;two after the conference (and if you can&#8217;t get your employer to pay for that&#8211;it might be time to re-think your choice of employers&#8230;.)</p>
<p>This morning I watched a simulcast of the&nbsp;&#8221;<em><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/EventDetails.aspx?CMTYSvcSource=MSCOMMedia&amp;Params=%7eCMTYDataSvcParams%5e%7earg+Name%3d%22ID%22+Value%3d%221032340737%22%2f%5e%7earg+Name%3d%22ProviderID%22+Value%3d%22A6B43178-497C-4225-BA42-DF595171F04C%22%2f%5e%7earg+Name%3d%22lang%22+Value%3d%22en%22%2f%5e%7earg+Name%3d%22cr%22+Value%3d%22US%22%2f%5e%7esParams%5e%7e%2fsParams%5e%7e%2fCMTYDataSvcParams%5e" target="_blank">Why I Can Hack Your Network in a Day! (Level 300)&#8221;</a></em> session by Marcus Murray.&nbsp; It was another great Tech-Ed security session in the tradition of Jesper&nbsp;Johansson and Steve Riley.&nbsp; I&#8217;d strongly recommend that you watch if you have any degree of responsibility for IT security (whether it&#8217;s the client, server or network.)</p>
<p>Marcus did some really good demos of how easy it is to hack most networks.&nbsp; The hash-injection and RDP demos made me really appreciate some of the decisions I made in the past (and fortunately no one could hear me laugh when I realized how exposed some environments are.)</p>
<p><strong>Links:</strong></p>
<p><a title="Virtual Tech&middot;Ed Home" href="http://www.virtualteched.com/" target="_blank">Virtual Tech·Ed Home</a>&nbsp;<br /><a title="http://shop.ecompanystore.com/mseventdvd/MSD_productdetail.asp?EventID=70870&amp;TYPE=Tech%B7Ed%202007" href="http://shop.ecompanystore.com/mseventdvd/MSD_productdetail.asp?EventID=70870&amp;TYPE=Tech%B7Ed%202007" target="_blank">TechEd DVD 2007</a><br /><a title="http://truesecurity.se/blogs/murray/default.aspx" href="http://truesecurity.se/blogs/murray/default.aspx" target="_blank">Marcus Murray&#8217;s Blog</a>&nbsp;(with notes from his presentation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=16</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MatchIT.ca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=10</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re an IT person in Canada and you&#8217;re looking to contribute back to the community, then MatchIT.ca is for you&#8230; &#160; Billed as &#8220;Canada&#8217;s IT Volunteer Matching Exchange&#8221; this is an initiative to match IT pros with charitable/non-profit organizations that are in need of IT assistance.&#160; It just got started this week and there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re an IT person in Canada and you&#8217;re looking to contribute back to the community, then MatchIT.ca is for you&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.matchit.ca" target="_blank" atomicselection="true"><img height="70" alt="MatchIT" src="http://www.geeksuave.com/BlogContent/AnnouncingMatchITConnectingCanadasTechni_E89B/Matchit_Logo_237x70.jpg" width="237" border="0"></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;
<p><a></a>
<p>Billed as &#8220;Canada&#8217;s IT Volunteer Matching Exchange&#8221; this is an initiative to match IT pros with charitable/non-profit organizations that are in need of IT assistance.&nbsp; It just got started this week and there are already 225 volunteers registered!
<p><a title="http://matchit.ca/" href="http://matchit.ca/" target="_blank">http://matchit.ca/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=10</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptops and Unencrypted Data</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=11</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deploying Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your company has&#160;customer details or sensitive information stored on laptops or USB keys and you have not yet taken steps to encrypt that data then continue reading.&#160; Preventing the disclosure of sensitive data&#160;stored on laptops&#160;is not a new concept&#8211;security conscious organizations have encrypted&#160;the data on their laptops since the days of DOS (although back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your company has&nbsp;customer details or sensitive information stored on laptops or USB keys and you have not yet taken steps to encrypt that data then continue reading.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Preventing the disclosure of sensitive data&nbsp;stored on laptops&nbsp;is not a new concept&#8211;security conscious organizations have encrypted&nbsp;the data on their laptops since the days of DOS (although back then it was a lot of work and required expensive third party software.)&nbsp; </p>
<p>Fortunately, it is&nbsp;now quite easy to encrypt the data on a laptop&#8211;it&#8217;s maintaining access to that encrypted data in the long run that is difficult (ie. can you regain access to&nbsp;the encrypted data when&nbsp;the keys are lost or forgotten???)</p>
<p>Some good news is that Microsoft&nbsp;has released&nbsp;a &#8220;<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=1a99576a-fe67-418f-88b1-81e2055fe977&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Data Encryption Toolkit for Mobile PCs</a>&#8221; that includes a Planning and Implementation Guide and and an EFS Assistant that&nbsp;will make it a lot easier to implement BitLocker and/or EFS.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve also included some notes, tips and links below that should help you keep your&nbsp;laptop data safe.</p>
<p><strong>Windows XP/Vista &#8211; EFS</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s Encrypting File System (EFS) has been around for a long time&#8211;but for some reason organizations have been slow to implement it (possibly because it requres some planning and extra work to implement correctly.)&nbsp; If you&#8217;re running AD and Windows XP then EFS is probably the best way&nbsp;for you to encrypt specific directories/files on your users&#8217; notebooks (although you may want to look at TrueCrypt&nbsp;for your USB keys.)&nbsp; My advice here is to <u>plan carefully</u> and <u>test everything</u> before implementing&nbsp;in production&nbsp;and <u>make sure that you configure data recovery agents</u> (don&#8217;t use the default Domain Administrator DRA.)&nbsp; Some good resources are:</p>
</p>
<p><font size="1"><font size="1"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223316" target="_blank">MS Best Practices for EFS (KB 223316)</a><br /></font></font><font size="1">TechNet Magazine Articles&nbsp;(<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2007/02/SecurityWatch/" target="_blank">February</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues/2007/03/SecurityWatch/" target="_blank">March</a> 2007)<br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312221" target="_blank">How to Encrypt Offline Files (KB 312221)</a><br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/810859" target="_blank">Problems with Offline File Encryption When Users Do Not Have Admin Privs (KB 810859)</a><br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/secmvp/sv1206.mspx" target="_blank">TechNet Security MVP Column (December 2006)</a><br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/241201" target="_blank">How to back up the EFS recovery agent private key (KB 241201)</a></font></p>
<p><strong>Windows Vista&nbsp;- BitLocker</strong></p>
<p>BitLocker was introduced with Windows Vista and can secure your whole computer (versus the directory/file encryption possible with EFS.)&nbsp; It also requires planning and additional work to implement correctly&#8211;so you should give serious thought to including it as part of your Windows Vista deployment and plan on buying computers (especially laptops) that support TPM.&nbsp; My advice here is to <u>plan carefully</u> and <u>test everything</u> before implementing&nbsp;in production&nbsp;and <u>make sure you store your recovery keys</u> (AD is ideal for this.)&nbsp; Some good resources are:</p>
<p><font size="1"><a title="Data Encryption Toolkit for Mobile PCs" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=1a99576a-fe67-418f-88b1-81e2055fe977&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Data Encryption Toolkit for Mobile PCs</a><br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/c61f2a12-8ae6-4957-b031-97b4d762cf311033.mspx" target="_blank">Windows BitLocker Drive Encryption Step-by-Step Guide</a><br /></font><font size="1"><a href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/58358421-a7f5-4c97-ab41-2bcc61a58a701033.mspx?mfr=true" target="_blank">MS BitLocker FAQ</a><br /><a href="https://msevents.microsoft.com/cui/r.aspx?r=1290932571&amp;c=en-US&amp;t=2" target="_blank">TechNet Webcast: Microsoft BitLocker in the Enterprise: BitLocker Tools to Make Your Life Easier</a></font></p>
<p><strong>Windows XP/Vista and Linux &#8211; TrueCrypt </strong></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have many laptops with sensitive data, or if you only need to protect the data stored on USB keys then I would recommend looking at TrueCrypt.&nbsp; It&#8217;s an open-source gem that allows you to create encrypted volumes on either your hard disk or external USB storage and can be used with Windows XP/Vista or&nbsp;Linux.&nbsp; It is powerful and feature rich&#8211;the only drawback is there is not really a mechanism to manage it across a large number of computers.</p>
<p><a title="http://www.truecrypt.org/" href="http://www.truecrypt.org/"><font size="1">http://www.truecrypt.org/</font></a><br /><font size="1"><a href="http://securitymusings.com/article/88/easy-truecrypt-volume-mounting" target="_blank">Script to Launch/Mount TrueCrypt from USB</a></font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>[Updated June 6, 2007 with link to&nbsp;latest version&nbsp;of Data Encryption Toolkit and TechNet Webcast]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=11</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa &#8211; 8 Years Later</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=9</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just reminded that the first mass email virus happened eight years ago this week&#8230;. Melissa struck my workplace on the afternoon&#160;of Friday, March 26.&#160; Fortunately,&#160;it was&#160;late in the day when Melissa arrived and only a small subset of computers were running Word/Outlook 97.&#160;&#160; I was the Exchange admin and this was before most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reminded that the first mass email virus happened eight years ago this week&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_%28computer_worm%29" target="_blank">Melissa</a> struck my workplace on the afternoon&nbsp;of Friday, March 26.&nbsp; Fortunately,&nbsp;it was&nbsp;late in the day when Melissa arrived and only a small subset of computers were running Word/Outlook 97.&nbsp;&nbsp; I was the Exchange admin and this was before most people had any form of email antivirus&#8211;so&nbsp;it was a&nbsp;nasty surprise&nbsp;for me (although it wasn&#8217;t the&nbsp;end of the world&#8211;I did miss a great dinner at one of my favorite restaurants.)</p>
<p>The clean-up was completed overnight (I had already written some VBA scripts to crawl mailboxes for specific file attachments for a different task&#8211;and upgrading these to remove Melissa was fairly easy.)&nbsp; </p>
<p>VBS/LoveLetter in May 2000 was a different story&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CastleCops and Phishing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=8</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=8#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CastleCops is a group that has been around for a while&#8211;but I never noticed them until recently.&#160; They are a volunteer group that focuses on identifying and eliminating &#8220;phishing&#8221; websites.&#160; Submit a phishing email or URL to them and one of their volunteers will verify it and then take the appropriate steps to get the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CastleCops is a group that has been around for a while&#8211;but I never noticed them until recently.&nbsp; They are a volunteer group that focuses on identifying and eliminating &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing" target="_blank" rel="" wikipedia? at Phishing?>phishing</a>&#8221; websites.&nbsp; Submit a phishing email or URL to them and one of their volunteers will verify it and then take the appropriate steps to get the website shutdown.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a very active group with lots of good information on their <a href="http://www.castlecops.com/" target="_blank" rel="CastleCops website">website</a>, there&#8217;s a&nbsp;PowerPoint with&nbsp;more details about CastleCops <a title="CastleCops PowerPoint at the Washington Post" href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/ccslides.ppt" target="_blank">here</a> or you can submit a phishing email/url via the <a title="Fried Phish" href="http://www.castlecops.com/pirt">PIRT/Fried Phish</a>&nbsp;link (only recommended&nbsp;if you know how to pull the URL out of an HTML email.)</p>
<p>They&#8217;re also looking for more volunteers&#8211;so if you have some spare cycles, sign up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=8</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part III</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=7</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=7#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, virtualization isn&#8217;t perfect&#8230; - It&#8217;s relatively new technology and the rate of change is still quite rapid (with all the headaches that go with that.)&#160; There&#8217;s a flood of new tools&#160;management tools being released&#8211; a&#160;new generation&#160;of&#160;CPUs with built-in virtualization support&#8211;and Microsoft incorporating virtualization into the next version of Windows Server (Longhorn.) - Problems and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>However, virtualization isn&#8217;t perfect&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>- It&#8217;s relatively new technology and the rate of change is still quite rapid (with all the headaches that go with that.)&nbsp; There&#8217;s a flood of new tools&nbsp;management tools being released&#8211; a&nbsp;new generation&nbsp;of&nbsp;CPUs with built-in virtualization support&#8211;and Microsoft incorporating virtualization into the next version of Windows Server (Longhorn.)</p>
<p>- Problems and errors are multiplied.&nbsp; If something happens to the host server, this will have a impact on all the VMs running on it.&nbsp; Make sure you have solid change management processes in place before going too far down the virtualization path&#8211;as well as a plan for how you will deal with hardware failures.</p>
<p>- Most implementations incur the performance overhead&nbsp;of&nbsp;the host OS (Windows or Linux) and any problems/instability that go with it.&nbsp; If a serious problem occurs in the host OS, this will impact any VMs running on it.&nbsp; If you&#8217;re currently having problems with server stability&#8211;don&#8217;t expect virtualization to save you.</p>
<p>- Success breeds VMs.&nbsp; The number of virtualized servers that you will need to support will increase.&nbsp; Make sure that you are ready to deal with this workload/complexity.&nbsp; If you do not have a CMDB for your servers already, then implement one as you start moving to virtualized servers.</p>
<p>- Virtualizing a server doesn&#8217;t eliminate all the costs associated with it&nbsp;(remember that the physical&nbsp;hardware is only part of the TCO of that server.)</p>
<p>- Not all vendors will support their OS or application running inside a virtual machine (although fortunately this is becoming fewer and fewer.)&nbsp; If a vendor&nbsp;is not willing to&nbsp;state their support for virtualization&#8211;expect them to use it as the scapegoat for any problems that may arise.</p>
<p>- If you&#8217;re implementing virtual servers because of bad software/applications&#8211;remember that virtualization doesn&#8217;t fix the bad code&#8211;it&#8217;s just a bigger and better band-aid.&nbsp; If you take this approach&nbsp;often enough, and you&#8217;ll find that you&#8217;re implementing extra virtual servers for every application that comes along.</p>
<p>- Moving to a VM platform&nbsp;is similar to moving to a new&nbsp;vendor/hardware platform&#8211;even with all the benefits&nbsp;it&#8217;s one of those things that makes many server admins a little grumpy/anxious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=7</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=6</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why should you be using virtualization technology?&#160; I&#8217;ve outlined ten reasons below&#8230; 1.&#160;&#8217;Cause all the&#160;cool nerds are doing it&#8230;&#160; (Virtualization is now&#160;mainstream enough now that your execs are going to read about it in their in-flight magazines&#8211;and when they come asking questions, it&#8217;s much better if you have an informed response.) 2.&#160;Your &#8220;Learning&#8221; environment.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>So why should <u>you</u> be using virtualization technology?&nbsp; I&#8217;ve outlined ten reasons below&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>1.&nbsp;&#8217;Cause all the&nbsp;cool nerds are doing it&#8230;&nbsp; (Virtualization is now&nbsp;mainstream enough now that your execs are going to read about it in their in-flight magazines&#8211;and when they come asking questions, it&#8217;s much better if you have an informed response.)</p>
<p>2.&nbsp;Your &#8220;Learning&#8221; environment.&nbsp; Virtualization allows you to work with multiple workstations or servers at a much lower cost than using real hardware (not to mention the heat and noise that real hardware generates.)&nbsp; Even better,&nbsp;many vendors have their&nbsp;OS and major software applications&nbsp;available as downloadable virtual machines (and Microsoft even uses them as part of the regular training curriculum.)</p>
<p>3.&nbsp;Your&nbsp;&#8221;Test/Dev&#8221; environment.&nbsp; This is where most people get started with virtualization.&nbsp;In many organizations it&#8217;s always a challenge to justify these servers.&nbsp; Fortunately, they are&nbsp;not used all the time and are normally subject to light workloads&#8211;making them ideal candidates for virtualization.&nbsp; Even better, both VMWare and Virtual Server provide additional features that allow you to roll-back changes made to&nbsp;the server (which is much better than rebuilding the server from scratch.)</p>
<p>4. Building Client/Server Images.&nbsp; Anyone that has built&nbsp;images for their client or server infrastructure the &#8220;old fashioned&#8221; way knows how slow and painful it is (no matter how good you are.)&nbsp; Doing the non-hardware specific portion in a virtual machine is much, much quicker&#8211;especially if you take advantage of the rollback and point-in-time snapshot features.</p>
<p>5. Software Packaging.&nbsp; In a non-virtual environment, software packaging is slow because you&#8217;re always having to go back to a clean machine and it&#8217;s a major headache keeping the various builds around that you need to in order to test your packages appropriately.&nbsp; With virtualization, you can start package quickly when your VM only needs to be run from the hard disk&#8211;and it already has your packaging tools running.</p>
<p>6. Appliances.&nbsp; A number of appliance vendors are now selling virtual versions of what used to be a hardware appliance.&nbsp; This is a great concept as it is still a hardware/software configuration supported by the appliance vendor but it allows you to run it on whatever hardware you have under a maintenance/support contract (eliminating the &#8220;hardware risk&#8221; that keeps many organizations from using appliances.)</p>
<p>7. Replacing Old&nbsp;Hardware.&nbsp; Many organizations have old servers in their datacenter still&#8211;and are either paying a whole lot of money for maintenance/support or are praying that the hardware doesn&#8217;t fail (as they no longer have a maintenance/support contract.)Â&nbsp; If the application can run on a server sold in 2000&#8211;it can probably run inside a VM without any problems (and the availability of physical-to-virtual migration tools makes this a lot less painful.)Â&nbsp; At the end, you may still be running an NT4 server&#8211;but at least you won&#8217;t have to worry about the hardware.</p>
<p>8. Isolating Bad Software/Bad Administrators.&nbsp; A lot of organizations have more servers than they actually <em></em>should&nbsp;because they have bought bad software, eg. three different pieces of software are needed to do job&nbsp;&#8217;X&#8217; but all three pieces are mutually incompatible and must be installed on different servers to work correctly.&nbsp; A variation on this is when&nbsp;software requires regular logons with privileged&nbsp;account by an application administrator (making it dangerous to put on server shared with other applications.)&nbsp; Virtualization allows you to provide all these additional servers&#8211;without as much impact on your hardware budget (although your TCO is still taking a hit because of the number of server instances you need to support.)</p>
<p>9.&nbsp;Fault Tolerance.&nbsp; Some servers in your environment are pretty important to your business&#8211;but unfortunately they do not support clustering or load-balancing (or you do not&nbsp;have the&nbsp;money to spend for&nbsp;a fault-tolerant solution.)&nbsp; Using virtualization and a SAN, you will be able to get to four 9&#8242;s easily (and possibly five 9&#8242;s) as long as you have&nbsp;your VM image on&nbsp;the SAN and datacenter staff that know when to&nbsp;fire up that image&nbsp;on the backup hardware.</p>
<p>10. Server Consolidation.&nbsp; This is the &#8220;holy grail&#8221; of virtualization.&nbsp; In many datacenters, servers are massively under utilized for a variety of reasons.&nbsp; If you take the right approach to virtualization, you can migrate from <u>many</u>&nbsp;underutilized physical servers to a <u>few</u> fully utilized physical servers (while maintaining the same number of logical servers.)&nbsp; This eliminates a lot of expensive hardware (and corresponding maintenance/support contracts) and should have a very positive impact on your datacenter&#8217;s&nbsp;electrical and air conditioning requirements.</p>
<p><strong>Links/Downloads:</strong></p>
<p><a title="Are You Virtualized? - Part I" href="http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=5">Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part I</a></p>
<p><a title="Are You Virtualized? - Part III" href="http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=7">Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part III</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=6</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=5</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you work in an an enterprise IT organization you should already be using virtualization technology&#160;(if only for test and development environments.)&#160; If you haven&#8217;t made this move yet&#8211;then it&#8217;s time to get started. The big players in the virtualization world are VMWare and Microsoft.&#160; Although I&#8217;m normally a big fan of Microsoft tools and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you work in an an enterprise IT organization you should already be using virtualization technology&nbsp;(if only for test and development environments.)&nbsp; If you haven&#8217;t made this move yet&#8211;then it&#8217;s time to get started.</p>
<p>The big players in the virtualization world are VMWare and Microsoft.&nbsp; Although I&#8217;m normally a big fan of Microsoft tools and technologies&#8211;I prefer the VMWare tools when it comes to virtualization.&nbsp; Start with an installation of VMWare Server&nbsp;and then load up one of the sample VMs available from the VMWare Technology Network (for something small/simple try the browser appliance.)</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re more comfortable with VMWare server, you can:</p>
<p>-&nbsp;create your own virtual server&nbsp;and install an OS</p>
<p>-&nbsp;download&nbsp;the newly released VMWare Converter and use it convert an existing physical server to a virtual machine (standard warnings about testing with production servers and/or in a production environment apply!!!)</p>
<p>-&nbsp;download one of Microsoft&#8217;s VHDs and use VMWare convertor to run it on VMWare server</p>
<p>- install Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual Server and get a feeling for its capabilities</p>
<p>More info and ideas&nbsp;in my follow-up posting &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=6">Are You Virtualized? &#8211; Part II</a>&#8220;&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Links/Downloads:</strong></p>
<p><a title="Download VMware Server" href="http://www.vmware.com/download/server/">Download VMWare Server</a></p>
<p><a title="Virtual Appliances" href="http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/">VMWare Technology Network &#8211; Virtual Appliances</a></p>
<p><a title="http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/browserapp.html" href="http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/browserapp.html">VMWare Technology Network &#8211; Browser Appliance</a></p>
<p><a title="Download VMware Converter" href="http://www.vmware.com/download/converter/">Download VMWare Converter</a></p>
<p><a title="Download Virtual Server 2005 R2 and start using VHDs today" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/software/default.mspx">Download Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 R2</a></p>
<p><a title="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/try/vhd/default.mspx">Microsoft VHDs (Windows Server 2003R2, Exchange 2007, SQL 2005)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2007 Learning and Training Resources</title>
		<link>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=4</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Bork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between now and the end of April, Microsoft is holding two webcasts per week on Exchange 2007.&#160; This is&#160;more content than what you would get in many courses.&#160; Even if you are planning on attending TechEd or more indepth training, check these out first&#8211;if only to avoid asking dumb questions 24 Hours of Exchange Server [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between now and the end of April, Microsoft is holding two webcasts per week on Exchange 2007.&nbsp; This is&nbsp;more content than what you would get in many courses.&nbsp; Even if you are planning on attending TechEd or more indepth training, check these out first&#8211;if only to avoid asking dumb questions <img src='http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a title="24 Hours of Exchange Server 2007" href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/tnexchangeserver.mspx#24HoursofExchangeServer2007">24 Hours of Exchange Server 2007</a></p>
<p>Also available are eight &#8220;labcasts&#8221; over the same period (with each an hour and a half long.)</p>
<p><a title="Exchange Server 2007 Guided Labcasts" href="http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/tnexchangeserver.mspx#ExchangeServer2007GuidedLabcasts">Exchange Server 2007 Guided Labcasts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.d2bork.com/BuildingInfrastructure/?feed=rss2&amp;p=4</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
